Fig. 5 | Nature Communications

Fig. 5

From: Integrating electric field modeling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects

Fig. 5The alt text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Model predictions. Scatterplots depict the power increase from the baseline to the post-stimulation block predicted by the statistical models, plotted against empirically observed values. Each dot represents data of a single subject. The diagonals indicate the line of perfect prediction (predicted Δpower = observed Δpower). The distance of each data point from the diagonal indicates the residual prediction error. a Predicted and empirical power increase for the tACS group. b Predicted and empirical power increase in the sham group. c Power increase predicted for each subject in the tACS group by the cross-validated model. For each data point ni the model was trained on n − 1 observations to predict the remaining ith observation. d Individually sham-controlled tACS effect (power increase relative to baseline after tACS−power increase relative to baseline after sham) on source-level α-power predicted by measures of tACS targeting. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page