Table 1 Net diversity effects (NE) on productivity, phenology and albedo.

From: Terrestrial land-cover type richness is positively linked to landscape-level functioning

Category

Landscape function

Landscape size

NE > 0 effect (mean ± s.e.m.)a

NE > 0 effect significance (one-sample t-test)a

Linear effect of log(LR) on NE (mean ± s.e.m.)a

Linear effect of log(LR) on NE significance (F-test)a

Productivity

\(\overline {{\mathrm{EVI}}}\)

250 × 250 m

0.026 ± 0.008

t27 = 3.3; P = 0.001 

0.054 ± 0.019

F1,20 = 7.7; P = 0.012 

500 × 500 m

0.035 ± 0.011

t19 = 3.2; P = 0.003 

0.087 ± 0.045

F1,16 = 3.8; P = 0.067

EVIGS (yr)

250 × 250 m

0.017 ± 0.005

t27 = 3.6; P = 0.001

0.033 ± 0.013

F1,18 = 6.8; P = 0.018 

500 × 500 m

0.022 ± 0.006

t19 = 3.7; P = 0.001 

0.045 ± 0.025

F1,15 = 3.3; P = 0.088

Phenology

GSL (d)

250 × 250 m

1.807 ± 1.346

t27 = 1.3; P = 0.095

3.364 ± 3.561

F1,19 = 0.9; P = 0.357

500 × 500 m

0.295 ± 1.862

t19 = 0.2; P = 0.438

−2.101 ± 8.644

F1,24 = 0.1; P = 0.810

Albedo

αNIR

500 × 500 m

0.030 ± 0.007

t19 = 4.2; P < 0.001 

0.055 ± 0.028

F1,17 = 3.9; P = 0.064

  1. aStatistically significant results are highlighted in bold
  2. The first test (NE > 0) indicates whether landscape plots with a mixture of land-cover types performed better than landscape plots with a single land-cover type. The second test [linear effect of log(LR)] indicates whether NE increased with log-transformed landscape richness [log(LR)]. Productivity: growing-season mean enhanced vegetation index (\(\overline {{\mathrm{EVI}}}\)), growing-season integrated enhanced vegetation index (EVIGS); Phenology: growing-season length (GSL); Albedo: near-infrared range (αNIR); t: t-value with associated degrees of freedom; F: F-ratio with associated degrees of freedom; P: P-value (n = 153 and 40 land-cover composition × block combinations with landscape richness > 1 in 250 × 250 m and 500 × 500 m landscapes, respectively)