Fig. 4: The pre-NETO phase is not due to physical constraints on new cell poles. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: The pre-NETO phase is not due to physical constraints on new cell poles.

From: A biphasic growth model for cell pole elongation in mycobacteria

Fig. 4: The pre-NETO phase is not due to physical constraints on new cell poles.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

ad Schematics and corresponding time-lapse AFM of growing M. smegmatis cells. Black arrows indicate the cumulated elongation of the old pole (OP) and the new pole (NP). Scale bar, 1 μm. a Close contact of new poles of newborn sibling cells is maintained after division of the mother cell (white arrows). b Elongation of cell poles after the new pole was partially freed by ablating the turgor pressure in one of the sibling cells using the sharp AFM tip (skull). c Elongation of cell poles after the new pole was freed by removal of one of the sibling cells using the AFM cantilever. d Elongation of cell poles after the new pole was freed and the old pole was physically obstructed by moving it into contact with other cells using the AFM cantilever.

Back to article page