Table 2 Conditional analysis for Indel I and SNP3 in natural and F8-RIL populations.
From: Neo-functionalization of a Teosinte branched 1 homologue mediates adaptations of upland rice
Analysis | Natural population | F8-RIL population | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Comparison of Indel I-3bp+ with Indel I-3bp− conditioning on SNP3-T | Comparison of SNP3-T with SNP3-C conditioning on Indel I-3bp+ | Comparison of Indel I-3bp+ with Indel I-3bp- | Comparison of Indel I-3bp+ with Indel I-3bp− conditioning on SNP3-T | |
P-value (40 DAG) | 0.6954 | 0.0069 | 0.1343 | 0.1509 |
Mean value difference | 4.17% | 29.50% | 12.70% | 14.50% |
Variance | 9.1 | 8.4 | 9.4 | 9.9 |
Effect size | 0.17 | 3.22 | 0.62 | 0.72 |
P-value (50 DAG) | 1.60E-05 | 0.0003 | 3.90E-02 | 0.2032 |
Mean value difference | 30.70% | 32.10% | 11.20% | 6.50% |
Variance | 81.3 | 44.9 | 43.9 | 40.2 |
Effect size | 5.02 | 3.47 | 1.41 | 0.78 |
Tiller number comparison | Indel I-3bp+ <a Indel I-3bp− | SNP3-C < SNP3-T | Indel I-3bp+ >b Indel I-3bp− | Indel I-3bp+ > Indel I-3bp- |
