Fig. 2: White matter connectivity of the frontoparietal subnetworks.

a Subnetwork (A) is more strongly structurally connected to the default-mode system (mean = 2.07, 95% CI: (2.05, 2.09)) than is subnetwork (B) (mean = 0.676, 95% CI: (0.668, 0.685)). b Subnetwork (A) is less strongly structurally connected to the dorsal attention system (mean = 1.03, 95% CI: (1.02, 1.04)) than is subnetwork (B) (mean = 1.54, 95% CI: (1.52, 1.56)). Note that for visualization purposes, the data were not visually adjusted to account for two points coming from each subject, whereas the reported statistics do take this into account. The insets of panels (a) and (b) display the white matter fibers emanating from subnetworks (A) and (B), respectively. c The anatomical distribution of boundary control calculated with respect to the default mode and dorsal attention systems is overrepresented in the frontoparietal system in comparison with a nonparametric permutation-based null model.