Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditionsa.
Entry | Ligand | Base | T | Yieldb | ee (%)c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | (R)-BINAP | Barton’s base | RT | 48 | −17 |
2 | (R)-Tol-BINAP | Barton’s base | RT | 49 | −52 |
3 | (R)-SEGPHOS | Barton’s base | RT | 50 | −20 |
4 | (R)-DTBM-SEGPHOS | Barton’s base | RT | 43 | −66 |
5 | (R,R)-Ph-BPE | Barton’s base | RT | 38 | −21 |
6 | (R,R)-QUINOXP* | Barton’s base | RT | 55 | −31 |
7 | (R)-(S)-JOSIPHOS | Barton’s base | RT | 32 | 0 |
8 | (R,Rp)-TANIAPHOS | Barton’s base | RT | 57 | 86 |
9 | (R,Rp)-TANIAPHOS | Barton’s base | −30 | 61 | 96 |
10 | (R,Rp)-TANIAPHOS | TMG | −30 | 65 | 96 |
11 | (R,Rp)-TANIAPHOS | Et3N | −30 | 75 | 98 |
12d | (R,Rp)-TANIAPHOS | – | −30 | 77 | 97 |
13d,e | (R,Rp)-TANIAPHOS | – | −30 | 82 | 97 |
14f | (R,Rp)-TANIAPHOS | – | RT | – | – |

