Table 2 Comparison of remission rate according to patient’s clinical characteristics.

From: Influence of patient characteristics on chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

 

Patients no.

Remission no. (%)

95% CI

χ2

p Value

Overall

47

38 (80.9)

69.2–92.5

  

Sex

   

2.415

0.120

   M

23

16 (69.6)

49.2–89.9

  

   F

24

22 (91.7)

79.7–103.6

  

Age

   

0.036

0.850

   Pediatric cohort (<14 y)

17

13 (76.5)

54.0–99.0

  

   Adult cohort (≥14 y)

30

25 (83.3)

69.2–97.5

  

Previous allo-HSCT

   

0.044

0.833

   Yes

9

8 (88.9)

63.3–114.5

  

   No

38

30 (78.9)

65.4–92.5

  

Times of previous chemotherapy

   

0.424

0.515

   ≥10

19

14 (73.7)

51.9–95.5

  

   <10

28

24 (85.7)

71.9–99.5

  

Refractory

   

–

1.000a

   Yes

3

3 (100.0)

100.0

  

   No

44

35 (79.5)

67.1–92.0

  

Times of relapse

   

0.214

0.643

   1

25

21 (84.0)

68.6~99.4

  

   ≥2

19

14 (73.7)

51.9–95.5

  

Percentage of marrow blasts ≥ 5%

   

0

1.000

   Yes

32

26 (81.3)

67.0–95.5

  

   No

15

12 (80.0)

57.1–102.9

  

Percentage of marrow blasts ≥ 20%

   

0.151

0.698

   Yes

26

20 (76.9)

59.6–94.3

  

   No

21

18 (85.7)

69.4–102.0

  

High-risk cytogenetic factorsb

   

–

0.655a

   Yes

28

23 (82.1)

67.0–97.3

  

   No

11

10 (90.9)

70.7–111.2

  

Active EMDs before infusion

   

6.225

0.013c

   Yes

13

7 (53.8)

22.5–85.2

  

   No

34

31 (91.2)

81.1–101.2

  

Subgroup 1: CNS involvement only vs. no-EMDs

   

–

0.493a

   CNS involvement

6

5 (83.3)

40.5–126.2

  

   No-EMDs

34

31 (91.2)

81.1–101.2

  

Subgroup 2: CNS involvement only vs. EMDs other than CNSd

   

–

0.103a

   CNS involvement only

6

5 (83.3)

40.5–126.2

  

   EMDs other than CNS

7

2 (28.6)

−16.6 to 73.7

  

Subgroup 3: EMDs other than CNS vs. no-EMDs

   

10.775

0.001c

   EMDs other than CNS

7

2 (28.6)

−16.6 to 73.7

  

   No-EMDs

34

31 (91.2)

81.1–101.2

  

Tregs before infusione

   

0.605

0.437

   Higher cohort

28

21 (75.0)

57.9–92.1

  

   Normal or lower cohort

18

16 (88.9)

72.8–105.0

  
  1. aFisher’s exact test
  2. bThree patients did not have data on genetic factors, and five patients had cytogenetic/molecular abnormalities of undetermined significance.
  3. cCompared with patients without EMDs, the CR/CRi rate in patients with EMDs was significantly lower (91.2% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.013) with a statistical power of 82.9%, the CR/CRi rate in patients with EMDs other than CNS was the lowest (91.2% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.001) with a statistical power of 96.8%, but the CR/CRi rate in patients with CNS involvement only had no significant difference (91.2% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.493) with a statistical power of 9.1%.
  4. dThe locations of these EMDs other than CNS, include three patients with bone and soft tissue multiple locally involvement, two with testicular involvement, one in the right breast, and one in local bone concurrently with CNS involvement.
  5. eTregs data were not available for one patient.
  6. A two-sided Pearson chi-squared test (or Fisher’s exact test) was used for comparison between groups. Source data is provided as a Source Data file or available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13136078.v1.