Table 1 Effect of filter geometry, fabrication process, and operating conditions/parameters on xylem filter performance (flow rate, volumetric capacity (or filter lifetime), and rejection).

From: Engineering and characterization of gymnosperm sapwood toward enabling the design of water filtration devices

Performance metrics

Xylem filter geometry

Fabrication methods

Operating conditions/parameters

Sapwood area (A)

Thickness (t)

Dry preservation

Hot-water treatmentb

With cloth or GAC pre-filtration

Pressure used for driving flow (P)

Alcohol treatmenta

Stacking multiple filters in seriesa

Flow rate (Q)

\(Q \propto A\)

\(Q \propto 1/t\), if tracheids are well-connected, else decreases more rapidly with thickness.

Increases

\(Q \propto 1/n\), where n is the number of filters

No significant effect.

Generally increases; depends on water quality and pre-filtration process.

\(Q \propto P\)

Volumetric capacity (V)

\(V \propto A\) is expected for the same driving pressures

Unknown

Increases

Unknown; may be comparable to a single filter.

Increases if self-blocking is more dominant than fouling due to contaminants in water, else significant effect is not expected.

Generally increases; depends on water quality and pre-filtration process.

Unknown; depends on how pressure affects fouling.

Rejection: Filtration-based

No effect

Depends on particle size. Typically increases rapidly till thickness exceeds tracheid length; may not increase further if sapwood has resin canals, else theoretically expected to increase with length.

Increases

Increases; theoretically log-additive, if rejection of each filter is identical.

Depends on temperature and duration of treatment; may decrease rejection. Soaking at high temperatures or for long durations compromises rejection performance.

Depends on pre-filtration method used; GAC can augment performance by removal of chemical contaminants.

No significant effect expected.

Rejection: Adsorption-based (viruses)

No significant effect expected if permeate flux is constant

Expected to increase for the same driving pressure. \(\tau \propto 1/t^2\), where \(\tau\) is contact time.

Unknown

Expected to increase; theoretically log-additive, if rejection of each filter is identical.

Unknown

Expected to decrease. \(\tau \propto 1/P\), where \(\tau\) is contact time.

  1. aBenchmarked against water-dried filters.
  2. bHot-water treated, alcohol-dried filters compared to filters that are just alcohol-dried.