Table 1 Summary of TFM methods based on fluorescent marker beads protocol compared to prior state-of-the-art methodologies.

From: Two-dimensional TIRF-SIM–traction force microscopy (2D TIRF-SIM-TFM)

 

Lateral imaging spatial resolution

Axial imaging spatial resolution

Temporal resolution (frames per second)

Illumination power (kW/cm2)

TFM sensitivity (bead/µm2)

2D force estimation

3D force estimation

2D TIRF-SIM-TFM

<100 nm

n/a

1–10 fpsa

0.02–0.1

15–20

aTFM35

200–300 nm

20 nmb

1–10 fpsa

(2 µm z range)

0.02–0.1

0.3

Prior state of the art

 3D SIM-TFM17

<100 nm

250 nm

0.1–1 fps

(2 µm z range)

0.02–0.1

1

 2D STED-TFM31

<100 nm

300 nm

0.05–0.1 fpsc

1–105

2.2–5

 TIRF

300

n/a

1 fps

0.02–0.1

1

 FBSR32

200 nm

n/a

0.05 fps

Not reported

1.2

 High-resolution TFM10

200–300 nm

600–800 nm

0.2 fpsc

Not reported

Not reported

 Confocal

200–300 nm

600–800 nm

0.1–1 fps

0.1–10

1

  1. aThe primary speed limitation of TIRF, 2D TIRF-SIM-TFM and aTFM is imposed by the camera exposure time. bThe value represents the axial localisation uncertainty in aTFM. cThe value indicates the frame rate for a FOV of about 10 µm2.