Fig. 5: Inferred buoyancy flux as a function of fissure length, illustrating the transition from a point-source model for the plume stem to a line-source model. | Nature Communications

Fig. 5: Inferred buoyancy flux as a function of fissure length, illustrating the transition from a point-source model for the plume stem to a line-source model.

From: Rapid heat discharge during deep-sea eruptions generates megaplumes and disperses tephra

Fig. 5

The blue shading represents the range of inferred values of the buoyancy flux at the plume source F0 given the full range of umbrella fluxes, \({Q}_{umb}^{(min)}\,<\,{Q}_{umb}\,<\,{Q}_{umb}^{(max)}\), predicted by Eq. (4), as a function of the length of the source l. For a point source, or sufficiently small fissure lengths (l ≲ l*), the details of the source are unimportant to good approximation and the predictions conform to those of a point-source model, as given by Eq. (9). For sufficiently long sources (l ≳ l*), a model assuming a planar source becomes more applicable in accordance with the prediction of Eq. (11). The lengthscale l*, given by Eq. (12) and indicated by a dashed curve, represents the fissure length on which the predictions of the two theories are equivalent.

Back to article page