Fig. 3: Experimental observations of multipath wave-particle transition in the delayed-choice experiment. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Experimental observations of multipath wave-particle transition in the delayed-choice experiment.

From: A generalized multipath delayed-choice experiment on a large-scale quantum nanophotonic chip

Fig. 3: Experimental observations of multipath wave-particle transition in the delayed-choice experiment.

Measured transitions between particle and wave properties in several different scenarios: ac classical mixture; fh, quantum superposition; and km, intrinsic coherent quantum superposition. They are quantified by the probability distributions (normalized coincidences) for different {α, δ} of the control and {θd} of the target (θk = k(θ − π)) was chosen, in the 2-, 4-, and 8-path experiments. Density distributions (colored) represent experimental data, while contour lines (dashed) represent theoretical results. The F denotes the classical fidelity \({\sum }_{i}\sqrt{{p}_{i}{q}_{i}}\) summing over the whole space of (θ, α) or (θ, δ), where pi and qi are the measured and theoretical probabilities, respectively. High fidelities are obtained for all measurements. Results in ac are consistent with classical optical multi-slit interference. The asymmetry of transition patterns in the quantum case fh stem from quantum interference between wave and particle properties. Intrinsic coherent quantum superposition represents the intermediate particle-wave character, corresponding to the maximal wave-particle superposition, when α = 3π/2 or π/2. The δ-dependence of interference patterns in km, as an example measuring at α = 3π/2, confirms the existence of genuine wave-particle superposition. d, e Classical fringes, and i, j quantum fringes for the full-wave case at α = π, and full-particle case at α = 0, for d = 2, 4, and 8. The interference fringe becomes sharper for d-path interference; the multimode quantization results in a 1/d probability at the outport. Only when α = {0, π}, the classical and quantum fringes agree with each other. Examples of δ-dependence interference fringes for δ = {0, π/2} and α = 3π/2 in the n 2-path, and o 4-path experiments. The construction or destruction of interference appears by controlling the internal δ phase. Points represent experimental data, while lines represent theoretical values. All error bars (±3σ) are estimated from photon Poissonian statistics.

Back to article page