Fig. 4: A comparison of QB, QB + V and CLG model predictions for integrated LDOS with experiment for ETs of different sizes with different sides \(l\). | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: A comparison of QB, QB + V and CLG model predictions for integrated LDOS with experiment for ETs of different sizes with different sides \(l\).

From: Quantum billiards with correlated electrons confined in triangular transition metal dichalcogenide monolayer nanostructures

Fig. 4

a Column A represents the QB solution (V = 0) for different summed states (N), corresponding to \({{V}_{B}}\simeq {0.8}\,{\mathrm{V}}\). b Column B shows the QB + V model eigenstates with \(=-1\), and c column C is the CLG MC calculation result at 1/13 filling. d Column D shows experimental images for \(l=8\,a\), \(10\,a\), \(28\,a\) and \(38\,a\). Note the domain wall predicted for \({l} = {28}\,{a}\) (col. C), and corresponding STM image (col. D) shown by dashed lines.

Back to article page