Table 3 Prototype synthesis experiments.

From: Visual prototypes in the ventral stream are attuned to complexity and gaze behavior

 

V1

V4

IT

Monkey A

Median change in firing rate to adaptive synthetic images (no. experiments)

36.5 ± 9.0 (29)

24.8 ± 7.5 (28)

16.2 ± 4.1 (70)

Median change in firing rate to fixed reference images

−2.0 ± 2.1

−3.1 ± 1.6

−2.3 ± 0.6

Percent of successful experiments, defined as those where the final synthesized images evoked higher responses than the first-generation images (95% CI of difference not including zero)

96.6

85.7

71.4

Percent of successful experiments, defined as those where the final synthesized images evoked higher responses than the reference images (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, one-sided, P < 0.02)

96.6

78.6

61.4

No. generations needed to reach half-maximum mean response (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, two-sided, contrasting V1/V2 and IT)

10.5 ± 1.0

13.7 ± 1.1

17.5 ± 2.2 P = 1.6 × 10−33, Z-value 12.1, N = 99 experiments

Monkey B

Median change in firing rate to adaptive synthetic images (N experiments)

54.9 ± 15.7 (35)

46.4 ± 6.3 (30)

50.5 ± 11.6 (60)

Median change in firing rate to fixed reference images

−5.9 ± 1.6

−4.8 ± 4.1

−6.7 ± 1.3

Percent of successful experiments, defined as those where the final synthesized images evoked higher responses than the first-generation images (95% CI of difference not including zero)

91.4

93.3

83.3

Percent of successful experiments, defined as those where the final synthesized images evoked higher responses than the reference images (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, one-sided, P < 0.02)

88.6

66.7

55.0

No. generations needed to reach half-maximum mean response (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, two-sided, contrasting V1/V2 and IT)

12.0 ± 2.6

14.6 ± 2.7

16.4 ± 1.7

P = 4.8 × 10−33, Z-value 12.0, N = 95 experiments