Table 1 Participants’ physiological and endurance performance measurements.

From: High-intensity training induces non-stoichiometric changes in the mitochondrial proteome of human skeletal muscle without reorganisation of respiratory chain content

Measurement

BL

PN

PH

PR

Age

22.3 ± 5.2

–

–

–

Height

178.1 ± 10.7

–

–

–

Body mass

78.8 ± 12.1

79.0 ± 12.9

78.0 ± 12.5

77.9 ± 11.8#

BMI

24.8 ± 2.9

24.9 ± 3.2

24.6 ± 3.0

24.5 ± 2.9#

V̇O2Peak

46.7 ± 8.2

47.7 ± 8.8

50.5 ± 6.0*#

50.0 ± 6.0*

ẆLT

174.1 ± 30.7

182.5 ± 33.0

222.2 ± 36.2*#

219.6 ± 31.4*#

Ẇpeak

231.1 ± 43.2

233.2 ± 43.5

266.3 ± 42.4*#

264.5 ± 40.4*#

20k-TT time

2321.0 ± 168.1

2309.1 ± 257.4

2094.6 ± 130.8*#

2030.1 ± 140.5*#

  1. BL baseline, PN post normal-volume training, PH post high-volume training, PR post reduced-volume training, BMI body mass index [kg m−2], V̇O2Peak peak oxygen uptake [mL min−1 kg−1], ẆLT power at the lactate threshold [Watts], Ẇpeak peak power output [Watts], 20k-TT 20-km time trial [seconds].
  2. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. P values reported in the table were: P = 0.040 for PR vs. PN in “Body mass”; P = 0.041 for PR vs. PN in “BMI”; P = 0.004 for PH vs. BL, P = 0.046 for PH vs. PN, and P = 0.014 for PR vs. BL in “V̇O2Peak”; P = 4.5e−10 for PH vs. BL, P = 2.5e−8 for PH vs. PN, P = 1.5e−9 for PR vs. BL, and P = 9.6e−8 for PR vs. PN in “ẆLT”; P = 1.1e−8 for PH vs. BL, P = 3.8e−8 for PH vs. PN, P = 3.3e−8 for PR vs. BL, and P = 1.1e−7 for PR vs. PN in “Ẇpeak”; P = 4.3e−6 for PH vs. BL, P = 1.0e−5 for PH vs. PN, P = 4.6e−8 for PR vs. BL, and P = 1.0e−7 for PR vs. PN in “20k-TT time”. All values are mean ± SD; n = 10 for all analyses; all datasets analysed by repeated measures one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc testing; P < 0.05 * vs. BL, # vs. PN.
Back to article page