Fig. 4: Setup and results of a fluid-structure optimization problem with 20 × 8 design variables. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: Setup and results of a fluid-structure optimization problem with 20 × 8 design variables.

From: Self-directed online machine learning for topology optimization

Fig. 4: Setup and results of a fluid-structure optimization problem with 20 × 8 design variables.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a Problem setup: minimizing pressure drop through the tunnel. The vertical green line on the left denotes the inlet while the vertical blue line on the right denotes the outlet. b Dimensionless inlet pressure versus ntrain, the number of accumulated training samples. SOLO-G denotes a greedy version of our proposed method, SOLO-R denotes the regular version of our proposed method. The horizontal dashed line denotes the solution from the gradient-based method. The cross “X” denotes the convergence point (presented in d and e, respectively). c Optimized design obtained by the gradient-based method. \(\widetilde{P}=0.9569\). d Optimized design obtained by SOLO-G. ntrain = 286 and \(\widetilde{P}=0.9567\). e Optimized design obtained by SOLO-R. ntrain = 2148 and \(\widetilde{P}=0.9567\). In ce black denotes ρ = 1 (solid) and white denotes ρ = 0 (void). The solutions in d and e are equivalent since the flow is blocked by the black squares forming the ramp surface and the white squares within the ramp at the left bottom corner are irrelevant.

Back to article page