Fig. 1: Systematic mapping of m1A sites in small RNA space. | Nature Communications

Fig. 1: Systematic mapping of m1A sites in small RNA space.

From: TRMT6/61A-dependent base methylation of tRNA-derived fragments regulates gene-silencing activity and the unfolded protein response in bladder cancer

Fig. 1

a Chemical structure of m1A (N1-methyladenosine). b Overall m1A mapping strategy for small RNAs by combining m1A RIP and m1A-induced mismatch analysis. Synthetic m1A RNA is included as a positive control. c TGIRT identified as the optimal reverse transcriptase for m1A-induced mismatch analysis. Briefly, synthetic m1A-containing RNA at different m1A stoichiometry was sequenced by three different reverse transcriptases (RTs): TGIRT (thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase), PSII (ProtoScriptII, retrovirus RT) and RT-1306 (engineered HIV RT). For each RT, mismatch rate was calculated across all the reads that map to the synthetic RNA sequence (allowing 1 mismatch) as represented by the sequence logo. The mismatch rate at the known m1A site is then plotted against known m1A stoichiometry (R2 derived from linear fitting forced to cross intercept at zero). d ProtoScriptII leads to under-representation of m1A-containing RNAs. Cloning frequency is normalized to spike-ins. e m1A RIP successfully enriches synthetic m1A-containing RNA compared to input, when spiked in with total short RNAs. TGIRT captures enrichment better than ProtoScriptII. Data are based on four independent RIP experiments (two HEK293T and two U251). Boxplot center represents median, bounds represent 25 and 75%, and whiskers show the minimum or maximum no further than 1.5 * interquartile range from the bound. See also Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page