Fig. 3: Comparison of estimated lipidomic effect sizes between clinical lipid adjusted and unadjusted models. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Comparison of estimated lipidomic effect sizes between clinical lipid adjusted and unadjusted models.

From: Comprehensive genetic analysis of the human lipidome identifies loci associated with lipid homeostasis with links to coronary artery disease

Fig. 3: Comparison of estimated lipidomic effect sizes between clinical lipid adjusted and unadjusted models.

a Beta coefficients for independent unadjusted SNP-lipid associations (x-axis) are plotted against clinical lipid-adjusted SNP-lipid associations (y-axis). b Z-scores for unadjusted SNP-lipid associations (x-axis) are plotted against clinical lipid-adjusted SNP-lipid associations (y-axis). Z-scores for SNP associations reaching genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10−8) in either the clinical lipid adjusted or unadjusted models. Variant effect signs are fixed so adjusted associations are positive. Variants showing greater (positive) associations in clinical lipid-adjusted analysis are shown in red, and variants showing reduced associations are shown in blue. Circle diameter is proportional of −log10(P) t-test of effect differences.

Back to article page