Fig. 6: Relationships between the linear trends (1970–2014) in SIC and SST for HIST, NAGA, CMIP6, and observations.
From: Barents-Kara sea-ice decline attributed to surface warming in the Gulf Stream

a Scatter plots between the linear trends of DJF Gulf Stream SST [°C decade−1] (horizontal axis) and Barents-Kara SIC [% decade−1] (vertical axis) for one member of each CMIP6 model. Each model is denoted with different colored symbols, and the multimodel mean is indicated by a green star. The observations and ensemble means of HIST and NAGA are shown by black (HadISST2), gray (COBE-SST2), large blue (HIST ensemble mean), and large red (NAGA ensemble mean) markers. The least-squares linear fit for CMIP6 members is shown. The correlation coefficient and linear regression are shown in the panel. Vertical and horizontal lines indicate the SST and SIC trends for HadISST2 (black) and COBE-SST2 (gray), and multimodel means of CMIP6 (green). Box-and-whisker plots for SIC (right) and SST (top) trends are shown. The box extends from the 25% to 75% values of the data, with a line at the ensemble mean. The whiskers show the range from 5% to 95% of the data. b As in a, but for HIST and NAGA. Small blue markers indicate 50 ensemble members in HIST, and small red markers denote 10 members in NAGA. The least-squares linear fit for HIST members is shown. Vertical and horizontal lines indicate the SST and SIC trends for ensemble means of HIST (blue) and NAGA (red). c As in a, but for the ensemble means of CMIP6 models having more than ten ensemble members. Each model is denoted with different colored symbols, and the multimodel mean is indicated by a green star.