Fig. 3: Comparison of predictive capabilities between eciML1515 and ME-iJL1678 for E. coli. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Comparison of predictive capabilities between eciML1515 and ME-iJL1678 for E. coli.

From: Reconstruction of a catalogue of genome-scale metabolic models with enzymatic constraints using GECKO 2.0

Fig. 3

a Maximum batch growth rate predictions on minimal media with diverse carbon sources, with an average relative error for eciML1515 of 34,43%, and an R2 of 0.196. The sum of squared errors when compared to experimental values are 0.2785 for eciML1515 and 1.21 for ME-iJL1678. b Prediction of total protein content in the cell by eciML1515 and ME-iJL1678 using the optimal and generalist approaches. Source data are provided in Source Data: Data Source file 1.

Back to article page