Fig. 4: Deep learning accuracy with ‘huge’ trees.
From: Deep learning from phylogenies to uncover the epidemiological dynamics of outbreaks

Comparison of inference accuracy by neural networks trained on large trees in predicting large trees (CNN-CBLV, in grey, same as in Fig. 3) and huge trees (FFNN-SS, in orange, and CBLV-NN, in pink) on 100 large and 100 huge test trees. The training and testing large trees are the same as in Fig. 3 (between 200 and 500 tips each). The huge testing trees were generated for the same parameters as the large training and testing trees, but their size varied between 5000 and 10,000 tips. We show the relative error for each test tree. The error is measured as the normalized distance between the point estimates by neural networks and the target values for each parameter. We compare the relative errors for a BD-simulated, b BDEI-simulated and c BDSS-simulated trees. Average relative error is displayed for each parameter and method in corresponding colour below each plot.