Fig. 3: In the left diagram we show a discovery switchback (dashed) from 3 to 2, and an embedded switchback (solid) from 4 to 2. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: In the left diagram we show a discovery switchback (dashed) from 3 to 2, and an embedded switchback (solid) from 4 to 2.

From: Technology readiness levels for machine learning systems

Fig. 3

The difference is the former is circumstantial while the latter is predefined in the process. The other embedded switchback we define in the main MLTRL process is from level 9 to 4, shown in Fig. 4. While it is true that the majority of ML projects start at a reasonable readiness out of the box, e.g. level 4, this can make it challenging and problematic to switchback to R& D levels that the team have not encountered and may not be equipped for. In the right diagram we show a common review switchback from Level 5 to 4 (staying in the prototyping phase (orange)), and a switchback (faded) that should not be implemented because the prior level was not explicitly done; level 2 is squarely in the research pipeline (red).

Back to article page