Table 2 Comparison of the prediction value for EGFR-TKI therapy response in NSCLC patients using different methods (EGFR genotype and different labeling parameters of HX103-based FACS).a–d

From: A fluorogenic probe for predicting treatment response in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR-activating mutations

Patient (No.)

EGFR mutations

First-line treatmenta

Therapy responseb

EGFR(+)HX103(+) (%)c

EGFR(+) (%)d

HX103(+) (%)e

1

19del

Afatinib

PR

+(47.7)

+ (73.8)

+ (48.0)

2

19del

Afatinib

PR

+(46.4)

+ (58.2)

+ (53.5)

3

L858R

Afatinib

SD

– (26.2)

+ (64.5)

– (30.4)

4

L858R

Dacomitinib

PR

+(38.0)

+ (48.3)

+ (49.5)

5

19del

Gefitinib

CR

+(54.7)

+ (69.2)

+ (61.9)

6

L858R

Dacomitinib

PR

+(42.6)

+ (59.3)

+ (48.6)

7

L858R

Gefitinib

PR

+(34.2)

– (35.2)

+ (51.5)

8

19del

Dacomitinib

PD

– (4.84)

– (11.2)

– (13.7)

9

L858R

Icotinib

NE

+(50.9)

+ (49.8)

+ (92.6)

10

19del

Icotinib

CR

+(41.6)

+ (48.7)

+ (51.0)

11

L858R

Icotinib

SD

– (2.07)

– (0.83)

– (11.8)

12

L858R

Erlotinib

NE

+(30.8)

– (29.8)

+ (76.0)

13

19del

Gefitinib

PR

+(55.7)

+ (53.9)

+ (77.5)

14

19del

Gefitinib

PR

+(30.8)

+ (58.9)

+ (45.5)

15

L858R

Afatinib

SD

– (4.81)

– (10.0)

– (12.1)

16

Other

SD

– (2.61)

– (9.10)

– (5.01)

17

Other

PR

– (13.7)

+ (39.4)

– (21.9)

18

Other

PR

– (4.44)

– (16.9)

– (11.0)

19

Other

SD

– (3.27)

– (12.5)

– (7.41)

20

Other

SD

– (0.60)

– (10.9)

– (3.16)

21

None

NE

– (−0.3)

– (21.3)

– (−1.8)

22

Other

NE

– (1.35)

– (−3.51)

– (3.59)

23

Other

NE

– (4.89)

– (7.13)

– (12.9)

24

Other

SD

– (0.10)

– (1.92)

– (4.01)

25

Other

NE

– (0.24)

– (14.5)

– (1.16)

26

Other

SD

– (1.08)

– (17.5)

– (7.12)

27

Other

SD

– (10.8)

– (24.0)

– (18.4)

28

None

NE

– (4.24)

– (2.70)

– (19.5)

29

Other

PD

– (2.10)

– (5.06)

– (10.5)

30

Other

PR

– (0.45)

– (−3.7)

– (20.6)

31

Other

PR

– (6.32)

– (8.10)

– (16.0)

  1. aNSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were selected for EGFR-TKI therapy, while patients without any EGFR mutations were treated with other methods, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy.
  2. bResponse to treatment was categorized into four categories: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). NE indicates not evaluable.
  3. cFor EGFR(+)HX103(+), the threshold of 30.1% was used to determine EGFR-activating mutations.
  4. dFor EGFR(+), the threshold of 36.3% was used to determine EGFR-activating mutations.
  5. eFor HX103(+), the threshold of 31.0% was used to determine EGFR-activating mutations. “–” represents no mutations or mutation negative; “+” represents mutation positive.