Fig. 1: Crustal thickness variation versus spreading rate. | Nature Communications

Fig. 1: Crustal thickness variation versus spreading rate.

From: Seismic evidence for uniform crustal accretion along slow-spreading ridges in the equatorial Atlantic Ocean

Fig. 1: Crustal thickness variation versus spreading rate.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Crustal thickness (H) difference between segment centres and segment ends as a function of spreading rate. Only the crustal thickness constrained by active-source seismic data is considered. The crustal thickness data from the Atlantic Ocean are selected following two criteria: (1) systematically along-axis crustal thinning is observed within the second-order ridge segment and (2) the crustal thicknesses at segment centre and at least one segment end are measured. The blue squares show the difference between the average crustal thickness at the transform fault, fracture zone and pseudo-fault region and the average crustal thickness of segments obtained in this study. When the crustal thicknesses of both ends of a segment are available, the one with thinner crust is plotted. The crust at the ends of slow-spreading ridges is generally ≥2.8 km thinner than that at the associated segment centres. Data for East Pacific Rise (EPR), South and North Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) are given in Supplementary Table 2. The thin dashed vertical lines mark the boundaries of fast- and slow-spreading ridges79.

Back to article page