Fig. 4: Clinical performance validation. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: Clinical performance validation.

From: PCR-like performance of rapid test with permselective tunable nanotrap

Fig. 4: Clinical performance validation.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Clinical samples include COVID-19 patients (n = 42) and healthy controls (n = 20). We included low-viral patient samples (Ct ≄ 30, n = 20: 48%) to observe the enhancement in the case of low viral load. We performed the clinical test for each patient once (n = 1). a–f Sensitivity enhancement with BEETLES2 using (a) NP/OP samples, (b) saliva samples, (c) Delta variants, d Omicron variants, (e) samples from asymptomatic individuals, and (f) healthy controls. g–i Diagnostic accuracy of BEETLES2, including all the samples of NP/OP, saliva, asymptomatic, and various variants, shows that the overall sensitivity of BEETLES2 is significantly higher (88.1%) (P < 0.0001) than those using commercial LFA (14.29%) (P = 0.0041). Two-sided unpaired t-test was used for analysis and adjustments were not made for multiple comparisons. j Cross-reactivity using different respiratory viruses showing no cross-reactivity. k RT-qPCR with enrichment with AAO only and BEETLES2, showing that BEETLES2 can enhance molecular diagnostics even with VTM. l–n The feasibility of daily monitoring of COVID-19 represents the ability of frequent tests with significantly higher accuracy. With BEETLES2, we measured the Ct value over 37. Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean. VTM viral transport medium, BEETLES2 bioengineered enrichment tools for the LFA with enhanced sensitivity and specificity, AAO anodic aluminum oxide, LFA lateral flow assay, NP/OP nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal.

Back to article page