Fig. 3: Study area and magnitude clustering plots.
From: Seismic magnitude clustering is prevalent in field and laboratory catalogs
A Map of Harrison County, Ohio study area. Seismicity on the left side of the map is associated with the Ryser well pad, and seismicity on the right associated with Hamilton well pad. B Map of the Logan County, Oklahoma study area near the town of Guthrie. C Map of the west Texas study area. D Comparison of the cumulative distribution of difference in probability between the observed catalog and a randomized version, \(\delta P\left({m}_{0}\right)\), as a function of magnitude difference (\({m}_{0}\)), for each catalog before any filters are applied. E Same as D but after applying filters to address potential issues from catalog incompleteness. Same labeling conventions as Fig. 1.
