Fig. 6: Feasibility assessment by the IPCC AR6 WGIII of the C1–C3 pathways across five different dimensions. | Nature Communications

Fig. 6: Feasibility assessment by the IPCC AR6 WGIII of the C1–C3 pathways across five different dimensions.

From: Global fossil fuel reduction pathways under different climate mitigation strategies and ambitions

Fig. 6: Feasibility assessment by the IPCC AR6 WGIII of the C1–C3 pathways across five different dimensions.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Panels a–o show the 2020–2100 decadal feasibility assessment ratings by the IPCC AR6 WGIII of the C1–C3 pathways shown in Fig. 5. The grey shadings represent the full ranges of values across each of the C1–C3 ensembles. The feasibility ratings are as follows: Less than 1.5 = Low/Plausible; >1.5–2.5 = Medium / Best case scenario; More than 2.5 = High / Unprecedented. Following Figure 3.43 of the IPCC AR6 WGIII Chapter 3, the geophysical feasibility dimension shown here is for the biomass potential indicator only. (“n” denotes the number of scenarios with available data; no data are available for assessing the institutional feasibility dimension of the C2 IMP-Neg.).

Back to article page