Fig. 6: 2D versus 3D matrix imaging in a head phantom. | Nature Communications

Fig. 6: 2D versus 3D matrix imaging in a head phantom.

From: Three-dimensional ultrasound matrix imaging

Fig. 6

a Aberration law extracted with 2D UMI for a target located at z = 38 mm. b, c Original and corrected images of the same target with 2D UMI, respectively. d Aberration law extracted with 3D UMI. e, f Original and corrected images of the same target with 3D UMI, respectively. g Imaging PSF before (red) and after (green) 2D (dotted line) and 3D (solid line) UMI. The depth range considered in each panel corresponds to the echo of the target located at z = 38 mm.

Back to article page