Table 2 Physicochemical properties of the as-prepared sorbent samples

From: Mg-incorporated sorbent for efficient removal of trace CO from H2 gas

Sorbents

Compositiona (wt. %)

Crystallite sizeb (nm)

Peak area (%)

Cu dispersion (%)e

\({S}_{{{{{{{\rm{Cu}}}}}}}^{+}}\)a, d,e (m2 g−1)

 

Mg

Cu

Ce

MgO

CuO

CeO2

\(\frac{\alpha }{(\alpha+\beta+\gamma )}\)c

\(\frac{{{{{{{\rm{Ce}}}}}}}^{3+}}{({{{{{{\rm{Ce}}}}}}}^{4+}+{{{{{{\rm{Ce}}}}}}}^{3+})}\)d

\(\frac{{{{{{{\rm{Cu}}}}}}}^{+}}{({{{{{{\rm{Cu}}}}}}}^{2+}+{{{{{{\rm{Cu}}}}}}}^{+})}\)d

  

CuCeOx

-

57.8

28.1

-

16.7

4.5

15.9

23

64

3.7

9.2

Mg13CuCeOx

10.6

45.5

22.0

4.2

10.7

2.6

27.5

40

46

14.7

21.0

Mg23CuCeOx

16.5

35.9

17.3

4.9

11.1

2.3

20.3

37

44

13.4

14.2

Mg52CuCeOx

33.3

20.2

9.6

4.7

13.0

0.9

16.6

43

35

11.0

5.2

  1. aEstimated composition of Mg, Cu, and Ce ions by ICP-OES.
  2. bCalculated from the XRD patterns by the Scherrer formula.
  3. cEstimated from TPR results, and α indicates highly dispersed CuO species.
  4. dEstimated from XPS results.
  5. eDetermined from N2O chemisorption.