Fig. 2: Observation of a resonator steady-state response suggesting nonlinear damping. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Observation of a resonator steady-state response suggesting nonlinear damping.

From: Apparent nonlinear damping triggered by quantum fluctuations

Fig. 2

a Measured transmission magnitude S21 (dots) for different drive powers. While the shift in resonance frequency is expected from a classical analysis of the damped driven Kerr oscillator using Eq. (2), MinS21 is expected to remain constant (dashed line). b Measured MinS21 (dots) as a function of drive power. Eq. (2) yields MinS21 = 1 − κext/(κint + κext), suggesting a damping rate which increases with power \({\kappa }_{{{{{{{{\rm{int}}}}}}}}}\to {\kappa }_{{{{{{{{\rm{int}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{nl}}}}}}}}}(| a| )\) from \({\kappa }_{{{{{{{{\rm{int}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{nl}}}}}}}}}=2\pi \times 193\) kHz to \({\kappa }_{{{{{{{{\rm{int}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{nl}}}}}}}}}=2\pi \times 255\) kHz. Indeed, adding nonlinear damping \({\kappa }_{{{{{{{{\rm{int}}}}}}}}}^{{{{{{{{\rm{nl}}}}}}}}}(| a| )\) to Eq. (2) leads to theoretical predictions (solid lines in a) in good agreement with the data. At the three highlighted points, the expectation values of photon number a2 (where the minimum of S21 is achieved) are 1.1, 6.8 and 13.2.

Back to article page