Table 2 Comparisons of covariate-adjusted mean values of pharmacokinetic features between PrEP and non-PrEP users via the targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) method
PK feature | PrEP User Status | Mean (95% CI)a | Two-sided raw p-valueb | Two-sided adjusted p-valuec |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Clearance [CL (L/day)] | PrEP | 0.60 (0.54, 0.66) | ||
Non-PrEP | 0.52 (0.46, 0.58) | |||
Difference | 0.08 (0.03, 0.13) | 0.002 | 0.005 | |
Volume of the peripheral compartment [Vp (L)] | PrEP | 5.24 (2.59, 7.90) | ||
Non-PrEP | 4.88 (2.18, 7.58) | |||
Difference | 0.36 (−0.55, 1.28) | 0.44 | 0.73 | |
Distribution half-life (day) | PrEP | 2.35 (0.00, 8.10) | ||
Non-PrEP | 2.37 (0.00, 8.30) | |||
Difference | −0.02 (−0.42, 0.38) | 0.94 | 0.94 | |
Elimination half-life (day) | PrEP | 16.83 (4.40, 29.26) | ||
Non-PrEP | 17.39 (10.45, 24.34) | |||
Difference | −0.56 (−8.04, 6.91) | 0.88 | 0.94 | |
Steady-state area under the curve [AUCd (day/mL)] | PrEP | 1.74 (1.55, 1.92) | ||
Non-PrEP | 2.03 (1.83, 2.23) | |||
Difference | −0.29 (−0.45, −0.14) | <0.001 | <0.001 |