Table 2 Comparisons of covariate-adjusted mean values of pharmacokinetic features between PrEP and non-PrEP users via the targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) method

From: Adults on pre-exposure prophylaxis (tenofovir-emtricitabine) have faster clearance of anti-HIV monoclonal antibody VRC01

PK feature

PrEP User Status

Mean (95% CI)a

Two-sided raw p-valueb

Two-sided adjusted p-valuec

Clearance [CL (L/day)]

PrEP

0.60 (0.54, 0.66)

  
 

Non-PrEP

0.52 (0.46, 0.58)

  
 

Difference

0.08 (0.03, 0.13)

0.002

0.005

Volume of the peripheral compartment [Vp (L)]

PrEP

5.24 (2.59, 7.90)

  
 

Non-PrEP

4.88 (2.18, 7.58)

  
 

Difference

0.36 (−0.55, 1.28)

0.44

0.73

Distribution half-life (day)

PrEP

2.35 (0.00, 8.10)

  
 

Non-PrEP

2.37 (0.00, 8.30)

  
 

Difference

−0.02 (−0.42, 0.38)

0.94

0.94

Elimination half-life (day)

PrEP

16.83 (4.40, 29.26)

  
 

Non-PrEP

17.39 (10.45, 24.34)

  
 

Difference

−0.56 (−8.04, 6.91)

0.88

0.94

Steady-state area under the curve [AUCd (day/mL)]

PrEP

1.74 (1.55, 1.92)

  
 

Non-PrEP

2.03 (1.83, 2.23)

  
 

Difference

−0.29 (−0.45, −0.14)

<0.001

<0.001

  1. All comparisons were adjusted for age, body weight, race, behavioral risk score, creatinine clearance (CrCl), IFN-γ, and IL-10 levels based on data from PrEP users (n = 24) and non-PrEP users (n = 24). One PrEP user and one non-PrEP user had missing baseline specimen hence missing IFN-γ and IL-10 levels. All TMLE estimation results of means were averaged over 20 runs with a fixed random seed on top of the 10-fold cross-validation estimation procedure to ensure stability of the estimates. A bootstrap procedure based on 500 datasets was used to calculate the empirical variances of the estimates for each group and to derive the 95% confidence interval, as well as to test for a non-zero mean difference between the two groups via the Wald test. The Holm method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons of the five PK features.
  2. aCovariate-adjusted mean by targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) (See Methods for more details).
  3. bConfidence intervals (CIs) and p-values based on empirical variances estimated via the bootstrap procedure. Bold = significant
  4. cP-values adjusted by the Holm method to control for family-wise error rate.
  5. dArea under the time-concentration curves divided by dose amount.