Fig. 6: Spatiotemporal stochastic simulation of an excitable network that incorporates the dynamics of lipid-anchored and peripheral back-state associated membrane proteins.
From: A dynamic partitioning mechanism polarizes membrane protein distribution

a Schematic showing excitable network, coupled with reactions involving peripheral membrane proteins (PP) and lipid-anchored membrane proteins (LP). Excitable network consists of three membrane states: F (front), B (back), and R (refractory). Membrane-associated, freely moving unbound species (denoted with `u' subscripts) binds with two different states of the membrane) to form strongly membrane-bound, slowly moving species (denoted with B: and F: notations for back-region bound and front-region bound species, respectively). Unlike PP, LP cannot shuttle between membrane and cytosol. b Temporal profiles of normalized total intensity for different species (F, B, R, total LP, and membrane-associated PP). Although the bound and unbound fraction of LP varies locally (see Supplementary Fig. 12b), the total amount of LP on the membrane remains unchanged over time, whereas due to shuttling between membrane and cytosol, the total membrane fraction (combining bound and unbound) of PP fluctuates. c Simulated spatiotemporal profiles of F, B, combined F/B, and total membrane fractions of PP and LP. As wave propagation was initiated (from the left edge of the simulation domain), due to stochastic firing of the excitable network, both PP and LP exhibited compartmentalization and became dynamically aligned with the back-state. Dynamic profiles are shown in Matplotlib “plasma" colormap, as shown below. d Normalized spatial intensity profiles of total membrane fraction of LP, PP, F, and B along the white lines in (c). Note that like experimental observations, simulated LP profiles show the slight accumulation in the areas just ahead of the advancing-waves.