Fig. 3: Performance of the trained Random Forest models. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Performance of the trained Random Forest models.

From: Exploring interactions between socioeconomic context and natural hazards on human population displacement

Fig. 3: Performance of the trained Random Forest models.

A Predictions versus true values in logarithmic scale were obtained by averaging over all test batches in the bootstrapping. The color levels show the density of points. The Pearson correlation is 0.57. B Distribution of the R2 on the hold-out set for all the bootstrapping iterations. The blue density is obtained with all the covariates, while the red one is obtained by excluding the two weather variables, namely maximum precipitation accumulation and maximum 10 m wind speed.

Back to article page