Table 2 The advantages and challenges of different regulatory systems
From: Customizing cellular signal processing by synthetic multi-level regulatory circuits
Advantages | Challenges | Niches in multi-level circuit | |
|---|---|---|---|
Transcription factors | • The TF systems are extensively studied, and design automation tools9,23,35 and well-established libraries are available. • The modular design allows concatenating different modules into complex topologies. • The programmable TFs can target endogenous pathways. | • The transcriptional circuits show slow kinetics, especially in layered design. • The transcriptional circuits suffer from retroactivity, burden, and large genetic footprints. • The layered design is sometimes overcomplicated for simple logic gates. | • Sensor • Genetic “wire” to connect different modules and tune signal levels • Genetic controller • Layered logic • Dynamic control |
Recombinase | • The low basal level produces tight OFF states and digital response. • Recombinase-based circuits are genetically compact. • Irreversible recombination is suitable for memory and cascade. • Design automation tools15,42,137 and well-established libraries are available. | • The use of repetitive recognition sites may decrease recombination specificity and genetic stability15. • Some recombinase recognition sites show cryptic promoter or terminator activities15. • The recombinase-based circuits show slow kinetics. | • Digitizer • Recording and memory • State machine (synthetic differentiation) • Single-layer DNA-level logic |
Plasmid copy number (PCN) control | • Changing PCN can simultaneously alter the expression of all genes encoded in the plasmid. • Reduced PCN is coupled with cell viability under antibiotic selection. | • The kinetics is slow, constrained by cell division. • The number of plasmids used in the same cells is restricted by plasmid incompatibility. | • Global gene expression control • Cell viability control (kill switch) |
Riboregulator | • The RNA base-pairing is programmable and predictable, affording in silico design, prediction, and large orthogonal libraries. • The de novo-designed assembly of multiple RNA strands is suitable for multi-input signal processing. • The RNA circuits have small genetic footprints, fast kinetics, and low metabolic load. • Riboregulators can respond to endogenous RNAs. | • The riboregulators usually require high expression levels of trans-acting RNAs. • Promiscuous interactions with host transcriptomes potentially affect bacterial growth104. • Promiscuous interactions with surrounding genetic contexts (e.g., insulator141) affect modularity. • Some riboregulators change the protein sequences of genes of interest. | • Endogenous RNA sensor • Post-transcriptional multi-input logic • Dynamic control |
Riboswitch & Ribozyme | • Riboswitches and ribozymes are functional across different host organisms. • Ribozymes are amenable to aptamer insertion, allowing external regulation. • Computational tools to design riboswitches are available. | • Limited parts are available for RNA aptamers, and identifying new aptamers tends to be hard. • The dynamic ranges of riboswitches are usually low. | • Sensor • Dynamic control |
RNA inference (miRNA & asRNA) & RNA binding protein | • The circuits encoding these modalities could be delivered by RNA and regulated by external inducers and endogenous miRNA biomarkers • The RNA-binding proteins could amplify post-transcriptional signals and interface with protein-level regulation | • The function of miRNAs and asRNAs involves endogenous machinery, potentially causing queuing effect and burden. • The gene activation mechanisms are few; in most cases the gene expression can only be repressed. • The lifetime of RNA-delivered circuits is relatively short. | • Endogenous miRNA sensor (cell classifier) • Genetic controller • Post-transcriptional logic based on NOT gates • Transient gene expression for a short period |
Programmable RNA-targeting system | • The sequence-specificity is high and the ADAR-based systems can distinguish dinucleotide variants76. • The RCas system can deliver diverse effector proteins to execute functions more than activation and repression. | • The systems are not fully programmable, as the ADAR system recognizes specific codons in target RNA. • The ADAR-based translational control can only produce protein signals and produce peptides that may vary in immunogenicity77. • The large size and bacterial origin of the dCas protein hinder its application in eukaryotic systems80. | • Endogenous RNA sensor (cell classifier) and editor |
Protein regulators | • The protein circuits operate at fast kinetics100 • The protein interactions are functional across different cellular compartments and various host contexts • The protein circuits can easily interface with endogenous protein processes101 • The protein regulators can function in RNA-delivered circuits | • Limited parts are available, restricting the scale-up of protein circuits. • Overloading protein degradation machinery causes queuing effect87. • Protein proteolysis costs relatively high levels of energy like ATP87. • Inserting protein interaction domains to target effectors may disrupt the protein functionality and needs carefully selecting insertion locations. | • Signal transmitter between endogenous signaling pathway and synthetic circuit • Genetic controller • Post-translational logic • Dynamic control |