Fig. 2: Prediction accuracy of different spatial methods. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Prediction accuracy of different spatial methods.

From: MENDER: fast and scalable tissue structure identification in spatial omics data

Fig. 2

Linear SVM (A), RBF SVM (B), and Random Forests (C) are performed on the top of each spatial representation method across 13 data, respectively. Each method is run for 5 times. The accuracy is measured using tenfold cross-validation. Error bars are based on mean and 95% confidence interval. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page