Fig. 5: Quantitative comparison between the in-situ experimental HRTEM images (a, b) and the simulated HRTEM images (c–f) based on structure models derived from the observed shuffling mechanism (c, d) and the shuffling mechanism commonly referred to in literature23,34 (e, f), to determine the shuffling mechanism. | Nature Communications

Fig. 5: Quantitative comparison between the in-situ experimental HRTEM images (a, b) and the simulated HRTEM images (c–f) based on structure models derived from the observed shuffling mechanism (c, d) and the shuffling mechanism commonly referred to in literature23,34 (e, f), to determine the shuffling mechanism.

From: In situ observation of the atomic shuffles during the {\({{11}}\bar{{{2}}}{{1}}\)} twinning in hexagonal close-packed rhenium

Fig. 5

The red lines in the simulated HRTEM images indicate the \(\left\{11\bar{2}1\right\}\) twin boundaries. The yellow lines mark the edges of the prismatic planes in the matrix and twin. These lines are just for illustration purpose, and their position are determined by using the intensity peaks of atom columns within the referred planes. Scale bar: 200 pm.

Back to article page