Table 1 Rates and flow estimates for the 3-state model of DSB Repair for the 72 h time course
From: Uncovering the dynamics of precise repair at CRISPR/Cas9-induced double-strand breaks
Target | Process | Ratea (proportion of total event/hour) | CI [1–99%]c | Flowb after 72 h (proportion of total molecules) | CI [1–99%]c | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Psy1 | Cutting | 0.0092 | 0.0064-0.5434 | 0.5755 | 0.4031−31.0895 | <0.01 |
Repair-error | 0.0335 | 0.0276-0.0419 | 0.1518 | 0.1364-0.1683 | <0.01 | |
Precise Repair | 0.0791 | 0.0373-7.2711 | 0.3581 | 0.1812-30.6583 | <0.01 | |
e (processed DSB) | 0.2052 | 0.1659-0.2392 | / | / | <0.01 | |
U (uncut fraction) | 0 | 0–0.0001 | / | / | 0.98 | |
r (induction speed) | 9402.089 | 2.5443-20909.0328 | / | / | <0.01 | |
d (induction decay) | 0 | 0–0 | / | / | <0.01 | |
Repair accuracy | / | / | 0.7024 | 0.5478-0.9951 | <0.01 | |
CRTISO | Cutting | 0.0175 | 0.0129-0.029 | 0.8815 | 0.5429-1.2973 | <0.01 |
Repair-error | 0.0777 | 0.0611-0.0976 | 0.4375 | 0.3604-0.5178 | <0.01 | |
Precise Repair | 0.0675 | 0–0.1563 | 0.3799 | 0–0.8654 | 0.1 | |
e (processed DSB) | 0.32 | 0.2332-0.3908 | / | / | <0.01 | |
U (uncut fraction) | 0 | 0–0.1179 | / | / | 0.92 | |
r (induction speed) | 48.8311 | 5.3069-24293.2738 | / | / | <0.01 | |
d (induction decay) | 0 | 0–0.0048 | / | / | <0.01 | |
Repair accuracy | / | / | 0.4648 | 0–0.7 | 0.1 | |
PhyB2 | Cutting | 0.0718 | 0.0434-0.9763 | 0.9113 | 0.5786-26.7611 | <0.01 |
Repair-error | 0.0864 | 0.0741-0.122 | 0.5282 | 0.4966-0.579 | <0.01 | |
Precise Repair | 0.0583 | 0.0036-5.5634 | 0.3567 | 0.0229-26.0203 | <0.01 | |
e (processed DSB) | 0.0817 | 0.048-0.1353 | / | / | <0.01 | |
U (uncut fraction) | 0.4047 | 0–0.4395 | / | / | 0.04 | |
r (induction speed) | 8.0297 | 2.9301-1079.26 | / | / | <0.01 | |
d (induction decay) | 0 | 0–0.0073 | / | / | <0.01 | |
Repair accuracy | / | / | 0.4031 | 0.0414-0.9784 | <0.01 |