Fig. 3: Immune landscape and radiological response in MIST4. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Immune landscape and radiological response in MIST4.

From: A gut microbiota rheostat forecasts responsiveness to PD-L1 and VEGF blockade in mesothelioma

Fig. 3: Immune landscape and radiological response in MIST4.

A Histogram showing allele-specific loss of heterozygosity of the human leucocyte antigen relative LOHHLA involving two MIST4 patients (patients MIST4-017 and MIST4-024). B Top panel. Waterfall plot showing the expression of PD-L1 (35% overall, orange). Lower panel. Boxplot summarising the PD-L1 expression positive (n = 7 patients) in orange vs negative (n = 13 patients) in purple (p = 0.7). Data were analysed with a two-sided Mann–Whitney U test and data are presented as median value ± IQR. No significant association between PD-L1 TPS and response measured as the change in tumour volume (%) by modified RECIST 1.1. C Upper panel. GSEA enrichment plot showing significant enrichment of the hallmark inflammatory response signature in the R- vs NR-subgroup (Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p = 0.04). Lower panel. Relative activation of immune signatures in R- vs NR- subgroups supporting constitutive T-cell activation in the R subgroup. D Immunofluorescence microscopy comparing the proportion of antigen-experienced CD45RO+ CD8+T-lymphocytes in an exemplary R-group patient (MIST4-010) with an NR-subgroup patient (MIST4-09). Bar represents 50 μM. E Left panel. Boxplot showing greater proportion of CD45RO+ CD8+ effector T-cells in the R- vs NR-subgroup (for NR n = 9 patients and for R n = 9 patients p = 0.03); the boxplot is bounded by the 25TH/75TH percentiles, showing the median (horizontal line), maximum (upper whisker) and minimum (lower whisker). Data were analysed with a two-sided Mann–Whitney U test and data are presented as median value ± IQR. Right panel. Scatter plot showing a correlation between CD45RO+ CD8+ effector T-cells and tumour reduction (r = −0.52, p = 0.03). Data were analysed with a two-sided Spearman r test. F Left panel. Boxplot showing greater proportion of CD68+ myeloid cells in the R- vs NR-subgroup (for NR n = 9 patients and for R n = 9 patients p = 0.04; the boxplot is bounded by the 25th/75th percentiles, showing the median (horizontal line), maximum (upper whisker) and minimum (lower whisker)). Data were analysed with a two-sided Mann–Whitney U and data are presented as median value ± IQR. Right panel. Scatter plot showing the correlation between CD68+ monocytes with tumour growth (r = 0.51, p = 0.03; two-sided Spearman r test.). Blue points correspond to the R subgroup and purple to the NR-subgroup. G Top panel. Gene set enrichment plot showing EMT enrichment in the NR- subgroup. Lower panel. Kaplan–Meier curves showing shorter overall survival (3.5 for high EMT vs 6.1 months, HR 0.77) for patients exhibiting EMT enrichment signature in an independent cohort.

Back to article page