Table 1 Estimated critical exponents averaged across recordings belonging to the different conditions, with the number of recordings in brackets

From: Existence of multiple transitions of the critical state due to anesthetics

Condition (n)

τ

α

γ

γ(α, τ)

SR

 

Δ AICLogN

 

QW (12)

1.2(1)

1.7(2)

0.31(4)

0.34(9)

10/12

−28.99

2.14

3.41

Iso. 1 % (6)

1.24(4)

1.5(2)

0.41(4)

0.51(2)

6/6

0.34

1.79

2.02

Iso. 2 % (7)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

A.L. Iso. 2 % (3)

1.17(4)

1.5(1)

0.37(3)

0.33(6)

3/3

−1.15

1.54

2.30

Ket. 10 mg/kg (8)

1.08(7)

1.9(3)

0.28(5)

0.10(8)

5/7

−24.44

−2.08

2.10

Ket. 100 mg/kg (6)

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

A.L. Ket. 100 mg/kg (1)

1.05(2)

1.8(3)

0.27(3)

0.06(2)

0/1

N/A

1.35

N/A

Pen. 12.5 mg/kg (6)

1.0(1)

1.7(2)

0.28(5)

0.31(6)

3/3

−2.04

0.49

2.26

Pen. 80 mg/kg (4)

1.04(8)

1.8(5)

0.25(5)

0.1(1)

2/3

1.29

1.96

2.08

  1. Cases in which no scale-free statistics were observed have been left blank. Uncertainties for the exponents represent one standard deviation except in the case of awake-like (A.L.) ketamine, where the 95th percentile of MLE was used as there was only one recording. γ(α, τ) is presented as the average over all recordings for which the scaling relation in Eq. (2) was testable (i.e., τ > 1). SR is the fraction of recordings for which the scaling relation in Eq. (2) was satisfied within two σ, likewise relative to the number of recordings for which the scaling relation was testable. ΔAIC is presented as the tenth, median, and 90th percentiles (from left to right). Uncertainties for AL ketamine 100 mg/kg could not be established as there was only one such documented case.
Back to article page