Table 6 Exact p-values obtained using a two-sided and one-sided t-test (multiple tests were accounted for using a Bonferroni correction factor) for the informed vs misinformed and smart random walker, respectively in the results of Figs. 4, 5
From: A framework for the emergence and analysis of language in social learning agents
Figure | Maze scenario | p-val (Informed vs. Misinformed) | p-val (Informed vs. Smart Random) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Fig. 4 | e | i–vii | <0.0005 | <0.0005 |
f | ii | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | |
iii | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | ||
iv | n.s. | n.s. | ||
v | 0.025 | n.s. | ||
vi | 0.014 | n.s. | ||
vii | 0.001 | n.s. | ||
g | i–vii | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | |
h | ii | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | |
iii | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | ||
iv | n.s. | n.s. | ||
v | 0.001 | n.s. | ||
vi | 0.003 | n.s. | ||
vii | <0.0005 | 0.020 | ||
Fig. 5 | b | i | <0.0005 | n.s. |
ii | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | ||
iii | 0.001 | 0.008 | ||
iv | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | ||
v | 0.003 | <0.0005 | ||
vi | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | ||
vii | 0.016 | <0.0005 | ||
c | ii | 0.001 | n.s. | |
iii | 0.004 | 0.006 | ||
iv | n.s. | n.s. | ||
v | 0.023 | n.s. | ||
vi | n.s. | n.s. | ||
vii | n.s. | n.s. | ||
d | i | <0.0005 | n.s. | |
ii | <0.0005 | 0.001 | ||
iii | 0.001 | n.s. | ||
iv | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | ||
v | 0.004 | 0.004 | ||
vi | <0.0005 | <0.0005 | ||
vii | 0.010 | 0.003 | ||
e | ii | <0.0005 | n.s. | |
iii | 0.002 | n.s. | ||
iv | n.s. | n.s. | ||
v | n.s. | n.s. | ||
vi | n.s. | n.s. | ||
vii | 0.025 | n.s. | ||