Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the patients according to ctDNA positivity at baseline

From: Prospective assessment of circulating tumor DNA in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma treated with tebentafusp

Characteristics

Overall, n (%)

ctDNA unavailable, n (%)

ctDNA positive, n (%)

ctDNA negative, n (%)

p value ctDNApos vs ctDNAneg

N patients

69 (100%)

5 (7%)

39 (57%)

25 (36%)

 

Age, median (IQR)

59 (51, 66)

57 (51, 73)

61 (56, 66)

57 (47, 64)

0.2

Gender

    

0.5

 Male

29 (42%)

4 (80%)

14 (36%)

11 (44%)

 

 Female

40 (58%)

1 (20%)

25 (64%)

14 (56%)

 

Prior number of lines of therapy

    

0.05

 0

44 (64%)

5 (100%)

20 (51%)

19 (76%)

 

 ≥1

25 (36%)

0 (0%)

19 (49%)

6 (24%)

 

Baseline serum LDH, N = 68

    

0.002

 Normal

37 (54%)

4 (80%)

14 (37%)

19 (76%)

 

 Elevated

31 (46%)

1 (20%)

24 (63%)

6 (24%)

 

Chromosome 3

    

0.2

 Disomy 3

12 (17%)

2 (40%)

8 (21%)

2 (8%)

 

 Loss of heterozygosity

57 (83%)

3 (60%)

31 (79%)

23 (92%)

 

Diameter of the largest metastasis according to TNM

    

0.0000025

 M1a

40 (58%)

4 (80%)

13 (33%)

23 (92%)

 

 M1b/c

29 (42%)

1 (20%)

26 (67%)

2 (8%)

 

Sites of metastases at tebentafusp initiation

    

0.5

 Liver

59 (86%)

5 (100%)

32 (82%)

22 (88%)

 

 Liver + Other

10 (14%)

0 (0%)

7 (18%)

3 (12%)

 

Best response, N = 68

    

0.002

 PD

38 (56%)

2 (40%)

27 (71%)

9 (36%)

 

 PR

7 (10%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

7 (28%)

 

 SD

23 (34%)

3 (60%)

11 (29%)

9 (36%)

 

SF3B1, N = 62

    

0.4

 No

51 (82%)

3 (100%)

28 (78%)

20 (87%)

 

 Yes

11 (18%)

0 (0%)

8 (22%)

3 (13%)

 

BAP1, N = 61

    

0.2

 No

15 (25%)

2 (50%)

10 (29%)

3 (13%)

 

 Yes

46 (75%)

2 (50%)

24 (71%)

20 (87%)

 

EIF1AX, N = 59

     

 No

59 (100%)

3 (100%)

33 (100%)

23 (100%)

 
  1. IQR: interquartile range; N: number of patients available; PD: progressive disease; PR: partial response, SD: stable disease. ctDNApos: ctDNA positive; ctDNAneg: ctDNA negative. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. For continuous variables, Wilcoxon rank sum tests were employed. Two-sided statistical tests were used. P values ≤ 0.05 are indicated as bold formatting in the table.