Fig. 4: The voiding behavior and urodynamic analysis 2 weeks later. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: The voiding behavior and urodynamic analysis 2 weeks later.

From: A tissue bandage for pelvic ganglia injury

Fig. 4: The voiding behavior and urodynamic analysis 2 weeks later.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a The surgical procedure includes the steps of exposure, separation, crushing, insertion, and bandaging. The impression site was highlighted with black circle. b Morphology change of bladder. Diverticulum was labeled by †. c Residual urine volume 2 weeks later. n = 5. d The void spot distribution of all groups. e, f Analysis of void spot assay, including the total spot area, void spot area, and void spot number. n = 5. The number of void spot area varies as the behavior changes. g Urodynamic testing 2 weeks post-surgery. h–j Urodynamic analysis included baseline pressure, max effective contraction peak (max ECP), mean ECP, ECP variation, total voiding number, max effectual urine output (max EUO), mean EUO, and total EUO. n = 5. For bar graphs, data are presented as mean ± SEM. For box plots, box shows median, 25th and 75th percentiles and whiskers represent minima and maxima. One-way ANOVA followed by a variance homogeneity test with Levene correction and multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Outliers exceeding upper and lower limits are removed based on box plot analysis. Source data are provided in NC._data_file_s1.

Back to article page