Fig. 6: The performance comparisons for models after adjusting for clinical and radiological factors. | Nature Communications

Fig. 6: The performance comparisons for models after adjusting for clinical and radiological factors.

From: Integrated multiomics signatures to optimize the accurate diagnosis of lung cancer

Fig. 6: The performance comparisons for models after adjusting for clinical and radiological factors.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Predictive performance achieved by the models in subgroups stratified by age A, B radiological image CE, and nodule size FH. Pure-GGO comprised nodules with only GGO, and part-solid nodules consisted of GGOs and solid components, whereas pure-solid nodules had only solid components without GGOs. Subcentimeter pulmonary nodules were defined as the nodules with solid component size≤10 mm, and large nodules were defined as those with 15 mm≤solid component size≤30 mm, whereas pulmonary massed were defined as those with solid component size>30 mm. 6bp-5mC, the model established by the 6-mer end motifs selected from 5mC-sequencing data; DL-radiomics, the deep learning-based radiomic model score; clinic-mC, the model established by combining clinical variables with the 6bp-5mC model score; clinic-Radiomics, the model established by combining clinical variables with the DL-radiomics model sore; clinic-Rad(h)mC, the model established by combining clinical variables, the DL-radiomics model score, the 6bp-5mC model score with the 6bp-5hmC model score; clinic-RadmC, the model established by combining clinical variables, the DL-radiomics model score with the 6bp-5mC model score. AUCs areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves; GGO ground-glass opacity. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page