Table 1 Measures of metacognition examined in the current paper

From: A comprehensive assessment of current methods for measuring metacognition

Measure

Calculation

Based on a process model

meta-d'

d’ value that provides best fit to Type 2 ROC

No

AUC2

Area under the Type 2 ROC curve

No

Gamma

Rank correlation between confidence and accuracy

No

Phi

Pearson correlation between confidence and accuracy

No

ΔConf

Difference between average confidence for correct and error trials

No

M-Ratio

meta-d’ divided by d'

No

AUC2-Ratio

AUC2 divided by expected AUC2 under SDT assumptions

No

Gamma-Ratio

Gamma divided by expected Gamma under SDT assumptions

No

Phi-Ratio

Phi divided by expected Phi under SDT assumptions

No

ΔConf-Ratio

ΔConf divided by expected ΔConf under SDT assumptions

No

M-Diff

meta-d’ minus d'

No

AUC2-Diff

AUC2 minus expected AUC2 under SDT assumptions

No

Gamma-Diff

Gamma minus expected Gamma under SDT assumptions

No

Phi-Diff

Phi minus expected Phi under SDT assumptions

No

ΔConf-Diff

ΔConf minus expected ΔConf under SDT assumptions

No

meta-noise

Metacognitive noise computed using the lognormal meta noise model

Yes

meta-uncertainty

Metacognitive uncertainty computed using the CASANDRE model

Yes