Fig. 3: Heat and moist-heat extremes and impacts of different forcings on them. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Heat and moist-heat extremes and impacts of different forcings on them.

From: Impacts of irrigation expansion on moist-heat stress based on IRRMIP results

Fig. 3: Heat and moist-heat extremes and impacts of different forcings on them.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

ac Multi-model mean absolute values of the 99.9th percentile values of 2-m air temperature (T2m: a), HUMIDEX (HU: b), and wet-bulb temperature (Tw: c) of the first 30 years (1901–1930) in the simulations without irrigation expansion (1901irr). dl Multi-model mean impacts of all forcings (ALL: greenhouse gas emissions, land use and land management change, irrigation expansion, etc.) (df), all forcings except irrigation expansion (ALL-IE: gi), and irrigation expansion (IE: jl) on the 99.9th percentile values of T2m (d, g, j), HU (e, h, k), and Tw (f, i, l). Impacts are calculated by subtracting the values in the new exp_period by those in the reference exp_period (see Table 1). Hatches indicate that signals (>0.1 or <−0.1) are agreed by ≥5 of 6 models (results for the individual models are presented in Supplementary Fig. S1621). Results for other extreme event percentiles (the 99th and 99.5th) are shown in in Supplementary Figs. S2836.

Back to article page