Table 2 Optimized structural parameters of the anti and gauche conformers of the two reacting species, C2F4I2 and C2F4I•

From: Ultrafast structural dynamics of carbon–carbon single-bond rotation in transient radical species at non-equilibrium

 

anti-C2F4I2

gauche-C2F4I2

rCIA (Å)

θCCIA (˚)

θplA (˚)

rCIG (Å)

θCCIG (˚)

θplG (˚)

φdihedG (˚)

Theorya

2.20

115

121

2.20

116

120

66

ps-TRXLb

2.15 ± 0.03

112 ± 9.8

124c

2.14 ± 0.05

116 ± 10.4

121c

66c

fs-TRXL

2.12 ± 0.007

110 ± 0.66

120 ± 0.14

2.10 ± 0.034

114 ± 0.26

122 ± 0.25

66 ± 0.97

 

anti-C2F4I•

gauche-C2F4I•

rCIa (Å)

θCCIa (˚)

θpla (˚)

rCIg (Å)

θCCIg (˚)

θplg (˚)

φdihedg (˚)

Theorya

2.22

115

137

2.20

113

137

66

ps-TRXLb

2.16 ± 0.04

119 ± 8.2

140c

2.14 ± 0.05

118 ± 9.4

138c

66c

fs-TRXL

2.16 ± 0.013

119 ± 1.3

142 ± 0.70

2.14 ± 0.011

118 ± 9.0

139 ± 3.8

67 ± 1.5

  1. aThe structural parameters were obtained through the geometry optimization process using extended multi-state complete active space second-order perturbation theory (XMS-CASPT2)49 calculations.
  2. bThe structural parameters were extracted from global fitting analysis of the ps-TRXL data about the photodynamics of C2F4I2 in cyclohexane after 100 ps37.
  3. cThese variables in the previous study were not used as fitting parameters but were instead fixed to the values obtained from the DFT calculations.
  4. Structural parameters obtained from the femtosecond TRXL study in this work (denoted as “fs-TRXL”) are compared with those derived from computations (denoted as “Theory”) and the previous picosecond TRXL study (denoted as “ps-TRXL”)37. The parameters investigated include the C–I distance (rCI), the CCI angle (θCCI), the plane angle between the C–I vector and FCF plane (θpl), and the dihedral angle (φdihed). These parameters were characterized for four species, with superscripts (A, G, a, g) used to distinguish between anti-C2F4I2, gauche-C2F4I2, anti-C2F4I•, and gauche-C2F4I•, respectively. Overall, the structural parameters determined from this fs-TRXL study closely align with the ps-TRXL results, particularly for radicals, where the deviations are observed between the DFT values and the ps-TRXL results.