Fig. 3: Database utilization efficiency evaluation of VITAP compared to vConTACT2, CAT, VPF-Class, PhaGCN2, and geNomad.
From: VITAP: a high precision tool for DNA and RNA viral classification based on meta-omic data
Boxplots represent the performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, annotation rate) of five fragment subsets with different lengths (1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-kb), which were generated from their corresponding database The boxplots represent the distribution of averages of five classification matrices for 17 different viral phyla produced by two pipelines. The center lines of the boxes indicate the median values of taxonomic assignment matrices on 17 viral phyla. The bounds of the box represent the interquartile range, with the lower and upper bounds, respectively, corresponding to the first and third quartiles. The whiskers denote the lowest and highest values within 1.5 times the interquartile range. a The evaluation of taxonomic assignments on family-level. For each box plot, the boxes from left to right represent the statistical data of vConTACT2, CAT, VPF-Class, PhaGCN2, geNomad, and VITAP, respectively; b The evaluation of taxonomic assignments on genus level. The PhaGCN2 and geNomad lack genus-level taxonomic assignment capabilities, hence their related results are not displayed. For each box plot, the boxes from left to right represent the statistical data of vConTACT2, CAT, VPF-Class, and VITAP, respectively.
