Table 2 Bounds of uniform prior distributions for each parameter with underlying assumptions and interpretations. PFC: prefrontal cortex; OFC: orbitofrontal cortex; NAcc: nucleus accumbens
Parameters | Biological interpretation | Lower – upper bounds | Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|
COL | Lateral PFC to OFC coupling strength | 0–0.5 | Cortico-cortical long-range projections are glutamatergic/excitatory136 |
CLO | OFC to lateral PFC coupling strength | ||
COA | NAcc to OFC coupling strength | − 0.5 – 0.5 | Striato-cortical mean-reversal process can favour either direct (positive) or indirect (negative) pathway81 |
CLP | Putamen to lateral PFC coupling strength | ||
CAO | OFC to NAcc coupling strength | 0–0.5 | |
CPL | Lateral PFC to Putamen coupling strength | ||
CAP | Putamen to NAcc coupling strength | − 0.5 – 0.5 | Striato-striatal couplings can be inhibitory or disinhibitory81,83 |
CPA | NAcc to Putamen coupling strength | ||
\({\eta }_{{OA}}\) | NAcc to OFC (\({\eta }_{{OA}}\)) and Putamen to lateral PFC (\({\eta }_{{LP}}\)) drift; i.e., rate at which striato-cortical coupling strength returns to its baseline value | 0–0.1 s−1 | The drift of the striato-cortical mean-reversal process occurs at a timescale at least 10x slower than neural dynamics (i.e., phasic dopamine release acts at a timescale of hundreds of milliseconds)117 |
\({\eta }_{{LP}}\) | |||
σ | Amplitude of neural fluctuations from processes not modelled explicitly | 0.05–0.1 s−1 | The noise standard deviation is between 0.05 and 0.1 s−1 |
\({\sigma }_{{OA}}\) | NAcc to OFC (\({\sigma }_{{OA}}\)) and Putamen to lateral PFC (\({\sigma }_{{LP}}\)) volatility; i.e., the amplitude of random perturbations in coupling strength around its baseline value | 0.1–0.4 s−1 | The volatility of striato-cortical mean-reversal process occurs at timescales 2.5 to 10x slower than neural dynamics (i.e., tonic dopamine release acts at timescales of a few milliseconds)118 |
\({\sigma }_{{LP}}\) |