Fig. 2: HTS identifies PP as a SON-dependent nuclear speckle rehabilitator. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: HTS identifies PP as a SON-dependent nuclear speckle rehabilitator.

From: SON-dependent nuclear speckle rehabilitation alleviates proteinopathies

Fig. 2: HTS identifies PP as a SON-dependent nuclear speckle rehabilitator.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a Workflow detailing our initial drug screen and subsequent steps to identify nuclear speckle rehabilitators. b Dose-dependent effect on nuclear speckles morphology by PP, with a representative image of nuclear speckles under DMSO or 0.1 µM of PP (n = 25 ~ 57 cells collected evenly across three separate wells for each treatment). c Box and whiskers plot (box and whiskers represent 25th to 75th, and 10th to 90th percentile, respectively, with center line representing the median) of the quantification of total area-normalized perimeter of nuclear speckles in control and 1 µM PP per cell (n = 49 and 52 cells for DMSO and PP, respectively, quantified from three separate imaging experiments). d GSEA showing a similar transcriptome signature between PP-upregulated genes and 461 genes further amplified by SON OE during ER stress. e GSEA analysis showing a similar transcriptome signature between PP-downregulated genes and 901 genes further repressed by SON OE during ER stress. f Volcano plot showing fold change by PP versus log transformed P values. Genes induced or repressed by at least 1.41-fold with a P value smaller than 0.05 are boxed. g GO analysis of differentially expressed genes by PP. h Representative images and quantification of sphericity of GFP signal from GFP::SRSF2 MEFs with scrambled or Son siRNA treated with DMSO or increasing concentration of PP for 25 h (n = 51 ~ 81 and 31 ~ 62 cells for scrambled and Son siRNA, respectively, quantified from two separate imaging experiments). i Log2 normalized fold change in response to PP treatment (0.3 µm) for 24 h in control and SON KD MEFs (n = 3 biologically independent samples). All data mean ± S.E.M. Statistical tests used: unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test for (c, i). Kruskal-Wallis test for (b) and Ordinary one-way ANOVA for h. The corresponding quantified data points for (c, h) each annotated to indicate their respective independent experiments, are provided in the source data file.

Back to article page