Table 1 Comparison of Young’s modulus and fatigue threshold between our CPU/MP composite and other reported viscoelastic materials
From: Multiscale interlinked structures limit fatigue crack propagation in a MXene-polyurethane composite
Sample | Young’s modulus/MPa | Fatigue threshold/J m−2 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
Hybrid ionic skin | 1.8 | 2950 | |
PAMPS/PAAm DN | 0.3 | 418 | |
DMCI hydrogels | 0.2 | 4210 | |
Ionogels | 0.2 | 2120 | |
HA-PVA | 2.5 | 10500 | |
PEG Hydrogel | 0.05 | 100 | |
Polyurethane elastomer | 0.24 | 3900 | |
Rubber-glass nanocomposite | 30.3 | 1000 | |
FC-A PVA hydrogel | 12.5 | 1340 | |
Nanofibrous hydrogel | 13.8 | 770 | |
SHPU-SNS-0.3 | 1.2 | 1010 | |
Dry-annealed hydrogel | 9 | 1000 | |
Entangled hydrogels | 0.6 | 240 | |
CPU/MP | 51.1 | 8226.3 | Our work |
