Fig. 3: Comparison of electrochromic and energy storage properties.
From: Fast-switching dual-cathode electrochromic smart windows for year-round building energy savings
a Transmittances of the polyviologen|Zn mesh device without PEDOT:PSS at different voltages. b Transmittances of the device with PEDOT:PSS at various voltages. c Photographs of the state of the polyviologen|Zn mesh EESD with PEDOT:PSS at −1.2, −0.6, and −0.2 V. d Switching times of the polyviologen|Zn mesh EESDs without and with PEDOT:PSS ( − 0.1 and −2.0 V, 40 s intervals). e Variation of the optical density (ΔOD) versus the charge density. f Kinetic stability of two kinds of EESDs (−0.1 and −2.0 V, 40 s intervals). g The discharge capacity of the polyviologen|Zn mesh EESDs without and with PEDOT:PSS at 0.5 mA cm−2. h The corresponding discharge capacity at 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mA cm−2. i Radar plot of the performance comparison of the polyviologen|Zn mesh EESD with other zinc EC energy storage devices.
